]> bbs.cooldavid.org Git - net-next-2.6.git/commitdiff
x86, irq: Move __setup_vector_irq() before the first irq enable in cpu online path
authorSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:42:21 +0000 (11:42 -0800)
committerH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:47:22 +0000 (14:47 -0800)
Lowest priority delivery of logical flat mode is broken on some systems,
such that even when IO-APIC RTE says deliver the interrupt to a particular CPU,
interrupt subsystem delivers the interrupt to totally different CPU.

For example, this behavior was observed on a P4 based system with SiS chipset
which was reported by Li Zefan. We have been handling this kind of behavior by
making sure that in logical flat mode, we assign the same vector to irq
mappings on all the 8 possible logical cpu's.

But we have been doing this initial assignment (__setup_vector_irq()) a little
late (before which interrupts were already enabled for a short duration).

Move the __setup_vector_irq() before the first irq enable point in the
cpu online path to avoid the issue of not handling some interrupts that
wrongly hit the cpu which is still coming online.

Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100129194330.283696385@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Tested-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c

index 2430b31c9857ae43d971f9f7de2def584905d08b..937150e4c06dc27e5fc8583a71d2a81719bd8efa 100644 (file)
@@ -1256,11 +1256,16 @@ static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg)
 void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
 {
        /* Initialize vector_irq on a new cpu */
-       /* This function must be called with vector_lock held */
        int irq, vector;
        struct irq_cfg *cfg;
        struct irq_desc *desc;
 
+       /*
+        * vector_lock will make sure that we don't run into irq vector
+        * assignments that might be happening on another cpu in parallel,
+        * while we setup our initial vector to irq mappings.
+        */
+       spin_lock(&vector_lock);
        /* Mark the inuse vectors */
        for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
                cfg = desc->chip_data;
@@ -1279,6 +1284,7 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
                if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cfg->domain))
                        per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = -1;
        }
+       spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
 }
 
 static struct irq_chip ioapic_chip;
index 678d0b8c26f3152c67a833f3e782cb15c9d0a61b..b2ebcba729d96533f83d116dee6ce06b5ab96299 100644 (file)
@@ -241,6 +241,11 @@ static void __cpuinit smp_callin(void)
        map_cpu_to_logical_apicid();
 
        notify_cpu_starting(cpuid);
+
+       /*
+        * Need to setup vector mappings before we enable interrupts.
+        */
+       __setup_vector_irq(smp_processor_id());
        /*
         * Get our bogomips.
         *
@@ -315,7 +320,6 @@ notrace static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused)
         */
        ipi_call_lock();
        lock_vector_lock();
-       __setup_vector_irq(smp_processor_id());
        set_cpu_online(smp_processor_id(), true);
        unlock_vector_lock();
        ipi_call_unlock();