From: Namhyung Kim Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:34:06 +0000 (-0700) Subject: signals: annotate lock_task_sighand() X-Git-Tag: v2.6.37-rc1~85^2~63 X-Git-Url: https://bbs.cooldavid.org/git/?p=net-next-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=b8ed374e202e23caaf9bd77dcadc9de6447faaa8 signals: annotate lock_task_sighand() lock_task_sighand() grabs sighand->siglock in case of returning non-NULL but unlock_task_sighand() releases it unconditionally. This leads sparse to complain about the lock context imbalance. Rename and wrap lock_task_sighand() using __cond_lock() macro to make sparse happy. Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 393ce94e54b..3ff5c8519ab 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -2236,9 +2236,16 @@ static inline void task_unlock(struct task_struct *p) spin_unlock(&p->alloc_lock); } -extern struct sighand_struct *lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk, +extern struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *flags); +#define lock_task_sighand(tsk, flags) \ +({ struct sighand_struct *__ss; \ + __cond_lock(&(tsk)->sighand->siglock, \ + (__ss = __lock_task_sighand(tsk, flags))); \ + __ss; \ +}) \ + static inline void unlock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *flags) { diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 919562c3d6b..e921409b85a 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1105,7 +1105,8 @@ int zap_other_threads(struct task_struct *p) return count; } -struct sighand_struct *lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *flags) +struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk, + unsigned long *flags) { struct sighand_struct *sighand;