From d1f74e20b5b064a130cd0743a256c2d3cfe84010 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:52:29 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tracing/sched: Make preempt_schedule() notrace The function tracer code uses ftrace_preempt_disable() to disable preemption instead of normal preempt_disable(). But there's a slight race condition that may cause it to lose a preemption check. This was made to keep the function tracer from recursing on itself by disabling preemption then having the enable call the function tracer again, causing infinite recursion. The bug was assumed to happen if the call was just in schedule, but this is incorrect. The bug is caused by preempt_schedule() which is called by preempt_enable(). The calling of preempt_enable() when NEED_RESCHED was set would call preempt_schedule() which would call the function tracer again. By making the preempt_schedule() and add_preempt_count() notrace then this will prevent the inifinite recursion. This is because the add_preempt_count() would stop the preempt_enable() in the function tracer from calling preempt_schedule() again. The sub_preempt_count() is also made notrace just to keep it symmetric. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- kernel/sched.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 15b93f617fd..cd6787e5717 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -3730,7 +3730,7 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner) * off of preempt_enable. Kernel preemptions off return from interrupt * occur there and call schedule directly. */ -asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule(void) +asmlinkage void __sched notrace preempt_schedule(void) { struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info(); @@ -3742,9 +3742,9 @@ asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule(void) return; do { - add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE); + add_preempt_count_notrace(PREEMPT_ACTIVE); schedule(); - sub_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE); + sub_preempt_count_notrace(PREEMPT_ACTIVE); /* * Check again in case we missed a preemption opportunity -- 2.39.3