From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:24:21 +0000 (+0200) Subject: cris: push down BKL into some device drivers X-Git-Tag: v2.6.35-rc2~62^2~6 X-Git-Url: https://bbs.cooldavid.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f35d77645808d1b890abb1a36260bf228854259e;p=net-next-2.6.git cris: push down BKL into some device drivers A number of cris specific device drivers still use the locked ->ioctl operation. Convert them to unlocked_ioctl with explicit lock_kernel calls. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson --- diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/ds1302.c b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/ds1302.c index 77630df9434..884275629ef 100644 --- a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/ds1302.c +++ b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/ds1302.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -238,9 +239,7 @@ static unsigned char days_in_mo[] = /* ioctl that supports RTC_RD_TIME and RTC_SET_TIME (read and set time/date). */ -static int -rtc_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, - unsigned long arg) +static int rtc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { unsigned long flags; @@ -354,6 +353,17 @@ rtc_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, } } +static long rtc_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) +{ + int ret; + + lock_kernel(); + ret = rtc_ioctl(file, cmd, arg); + unlock_kernel(); + + return ret; +} + static void print_rtc_status(void) { @@ -375,8 +385,8 @@ print_rtc_status(void) /* The various file operations we support. */ static const struct file_operations rtc_fops = { - .owner = THIS_MODULE, - .ioctl = rtc_ioctl, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .unlocked_ioctl = rtc_unlocked_ioctl, }; /* Probe for the chip by writing something to its RAM and try reading it back. */ diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/pcf8563.c b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/pcf8563.c index 1e90c1a9c84..7dcb1f85f42 100644 --- a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/pcf8563.c +++ b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/pcf8563.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(rtc_lock); /* Protect state etc */ static const unsigned char days_in_month[] = { 0, 31, 28, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31 }; -int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long); +static long pcf8563_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long); /* Cache VL bit value read at driver init since writing the RTC_SECOND * register clears the VL status. @@ -62,7 +63,7 @@ static int voltage_low; static const struct file_operations pcf8563_fops = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, - .ioctl = pcf8563_ioctl, + .unlocked_ioctl = pcf8563_unlocked_ioctl, }; unsigned char @@ -212,8 +213,7 @@ pcf8563_exit(void) * ioctl calls for this driver. Why return -ENOTTY upon error? Because * POSIX says so! */ -int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, - unsigned long arg) +static int pcf8563_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { /* Some sanity checks. */ if (_IOC_TYPE(cmd) != RTC_MAGIC) @@ -339,6 +339,17 @@ int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, return 0; } +static long pcf8563_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) +{ + int ret; + + lock_kernel(); + return pcf8563_ioctl(filp, cmd, arg); + unlock_kernel(); + + return ret; +} + static int __init pcf8563_register(void) { if (pcf8563_init() < 0) { diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/i2c.c b/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/i2c.c index 506826399ae..2fd6a740d89 100644 --- a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/i2c.c +++ b/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/i2c.c @@ -649,10 +649,10 @@ i2c_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) /* Main device API. ioctl's to write or read to/from i2c registers. */ -static int -i2c_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, - unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) +static long +i2c_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { + int ret; if(_IOC_TYPE(cmd) != ETRAXI2C_IOCTYPE) { return -ENOTTY; } @@ -665,9 +665,13 @@ i2c_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, I2C_ARGREG(arg), I2C_ARGVALUE(arg))); - return i2c_writereg(I2C_ARGSLAVE(arg), + lock_kernel(); + ret = i2c_writereg(I2C_ARGSLAVE(arg), I2C_ARGREG(arg), I2C_ARGVALUE(arg)); + unlock_kernel(); + return ret; + case I2C_READREG: { unsigned char val; @@ -675,7 +679,9 @@ i2c_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, D(printk("i2cr %d %d ", I2C_ARGSLAVE(arg), I2C_ARGREG(arg))); + lock_kernel(); val = i2c_readreg(I2C_ARGSLAVE(arg), I2C_ARGREG(arg)); + unlock_kernel(); D(printk("= %d\n", val)); return val; } @@ -688,10 +694,10 @@ i2c_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, } static const struct file_operations i2c_fops = { - .owner = THIS_MODULE, - .ioctl = i2c_ioctl, - .open = i2c_open, - .release = i2c_release, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .unlocked_ioctl = i2c_ioctl, + .open = i2c_open, + .release = i2c_release, }; static int __init i2c_init(void) diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pcf8563.c b/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pcf8563.c index f4478506e52..bef6eb53b15 100644 --- a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pcf8563.c +++ b/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pcf8563.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(rtc_lock); /* Protect state etc */ static const unsigned char days_in_month[] = { 0, 31, 28, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31 }; -int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long); +static long pcf8563_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); /* Cache VL bit value read at driver init since writing the RTC_SECOND * register clears the VL status. @@ -57,8 +58,8 @@ int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long); static int voltage_low; static const struct file_operations pcf8563_fops = { - .owner = THIS_MODULE, - .ioctl = pcf8563_ioctl + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .unlocked_ioctl = pcf8563_unlocked_ioctl, }; unsigned char @@ -208,8 +209,7 @@ pcf8563_exit(void) * ioctl calls for this driver. Why return -ENOTTY upon error? Because * POSIX says so! */ -int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, - unsigned long arg) +static int pcf8563_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { /* Some sanity checks. */ if (_IOC_TYPE(cmd) != RTC_MAGIC) @@ -335,6 +335,17 @@ int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, return 0; } +static long pcf8563_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) +{ + int ret; + + lock_kernel(); + return pcf8563_ioctl(filp, cmd, arg); + unlock_kernel(); + + return ret; +} + static int __init pcf8563_register(void) { if (pcf8563_init() < 0) {