From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:37:17 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: TTY/n_gsm: potential double lock
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.35-rc2~16^2~6
X-Git-Url: http://bbs.cooldavid.org/git/?p=net-next-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=328be395a396b1333b56e04571365dc614c96e46

TTY/n_gsm: potential double lock

In gsm_dlci_data_kick() we call gsm_dlci_data_sweep() with the
"gsm->tx_lock" held so we can't lock it again inside
gsm_dlci_data_sweep().  I removed that lock from and added one to
gsmld_write_wakeup() instead.  The sweep function is only called from
those two places.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---

diff --git a/drivers/char/n_gsm.c b/drivers/char/n_gsm.c
index c4161d5e053..e4089c432f1 100644
--- a/drivers/char/n_gsm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/n_gsm.c
@@ -904,9 +904,7 @@ static void gsm_dlci_data_sweep(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 	int len;
 	/* Priority ordering: We should do priority with RR of the groups */
 	int i = 1;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
 	while (i < NUM_DLCI) {
 		struct gsm_dlci *dlci;
 
@@ -927,7 +925,6 @@ static void gsm_dlci_data_sweep(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 		if (len == 0)
 			i++;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2230,12 +2227,16 @@ static int gsmld_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
 static void gsmld_write_wakeup(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
 	struct gsm_mux *gsm = tty->disc_data;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Queue poll */
 	clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &tty->flags);
 	gsm_data_kick(gsm);
-	if (gsm->tx_bytes < TX_THRESH_LO)
+	if (gsm->tx_bytes < TX_THRESH_LO) {
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
 		gsm_dlci_data_sweep(gsm);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm->tx_lock, flags);
+	}
 }
 
 /**