From d61e7380b402a481ab1fa8027068a24918f701c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kyle McMartin Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:31:53 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] drm: edid revision 0 is valid edid->revision == 0 should be valid (at least, so the error message indicates. :) and wikipedia seems to indicate that EDID 1.0 existed. We can dump the entire check, since edid->revision is a u8, so it can't ever be less than 0. Marko reports in RH bz#476735 that his monitor claims to be EDID 1.0, and therefore hits the check and is stuck at 800x600 because of it. Reported-by: Marko Ristola Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin Acked-by: Jesse Barnes Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c index e902b1cefc0..a839a28d8ee 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static bool edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid) DRM_ERROR("EDID has major version %d, instead of 1\n", edid->version); goto bad; } - if (edid->revision <= 0 || edid->revision > 3) { + if (edid->revision > 3) { DRM_ERROR("EDID has minor version %d, which is not between 0-3\n", edid->revision); goto bad; } -- 2.39.3