From 122ca0076e5f84fa12943f22f6586ff285670783 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:56:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [CIFS] Use unsigned ea length for clarity

Jeff correctly noted that using unsigned ea length is more intuitive.
CC: Jeff Lyaton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
---
 fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
index 99ae57d01d4..b79ff68c47c 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
@@ -5392,7 +5392,7 @@ QAllEAsRetry:
 	temp_fea = ea_response_data->list;
 	temp_ptr = (char *)temp_fea;
 	while (list_len > 0) {
-		int name_len;
+		unsigned int name_len;
 		__u16 value_len;
 
 		list_len -= 4;
-- 
2.39.3