]> bbs.cooldavid.org Git - net-next-2.6.git/blame - net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
[IPV6]: Introduce inet6_rsk()
[net-next-2.6.git] / net / ipv4 / tcp_minisocks.c
CommitLineData
1da177e4
LT
1/*
2 * INET An implementation of the TCP/IP protocol suite for the LINUX
3 * operating system. INET is implemented using the BSD Socket
4 * interface as the means of communication with the user level.
5 *
6 * Implementation of the Transmission Control Protocol(TCP).
7 *
8 * Version: $Id: tcp_minisocks.c,v 1.15 2002/02/01 22:01:04 davem Exp $
9 *
02c30a84 10 * Authors: Ross Biro
1da177e4
LT
11 * Fred N. van Kempen, <waltje@uWalt.NL.Mugnet.ORG>
12 * Mark Evans, <evansmp@uhura.aston.ac.uk>
13 * Corey Minyard <wf-rch!minyard@relay.EU.net>
14 * Florian La Roche, <flla@stud.uni-sb.de>
15 * Charles Hedrick, <hedrick@klinzhai.rutgers.edu>
16 * Linus Torvalds, <torvalds@cs.helsinki.fi>
17 * Alan Cox, <gw4pts@gw4pts.ampr.org>
18 * Matthew Dillon, <dillon@apollo.west.oic.com>
19 * Arnt Gulbrandsen, <agulbra@nvg.unit.no>
20 * Jorge Cwik, <jorge@laser.satlink.net>
21 */
22
23#include <linux/config.h>
24#include <linux/mm.h>
25#include <linux/module.h>
26#include <linux/sysctl.h>
27#include <linux/workqueue.h>
28#include <net/tcp.h>
29#include <net/inet_common.h>
30#include <net/xfrm.h>
31
32#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
33#define SYNC_INIT 0 /* let the user enable it */
34#else
35#define SYNC_INIT 1
36#endif
37
1da177e4
LT
38int sysctl_tcp_syncookies = SYNC_INIT;
39int sysctl_tcp_abort_on_overflow;
40
295ff7ed
ACM
41struct inet_timewait_death_row tcp_death_row = {
42 .sysctl_max_tw_buckets = NR_FILE * 2,
43 .period = TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN / INET_TWDR_TWKILL_SLOTS,
44 .death_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
45 .hashinfo = &tcp_hashinfo,
46 .tw_timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(inet_twdr_hangman, 0,
47 (unsigned long)&tcp_death_row),
48 .twkill_work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(tcp_death_row.twkill_work,
49 inet_twdr_twkill_work,
50 &tcp_death_row),
51/* Short-time timewait calendar */
52
53 .twcal_hand = -1,
54 .twcal_timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(inet_twdr_twcal_tick, 0,
55 (unsigned long)&tcp_death_row),
56};
57
58EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_death_row);
59
1da177e4
LT
60static __inline__ int tcp_in_window(u32 seq, u32 end_seq, u32 s_win, u32 e_win)
61{
62 if (seq == s_win)
63 return 1;
64 if (after(end_seq, s_win) && before(seq, e_win))
65 return 1;
66 return (seq == e_win && seq == end_seq);
67}
68
1da177e4
LT
69/*
70 * * Main purpose of TIME-WAIT state is to close connection gracefully,
71 * when one of ends sits in LAST-ACK or CLOSING retransmitting FIN
72 * (and, probably, tail of data) and one or more our ACKs are lost.
73 * * What is TIME-WAIT timeout? It is associated with maximal packet
74 * lifetime in the internet, which results in wrong conclusion, that
75 * it is set to catch "old duplicate segments" wandering out of their path.
76 * It is not quite correct. This timeout is calculated so that it exceeds
77 * maximal retransmission timeout enough to allow to lose one (or more)
78 * segments sent by peer and our ACKs. This time may be calculated from RTO.
79 * * When TIME-WAIT socket receives RST, it means that another end
80 * finally closed and we are allowed to kill TIME-WAIT too.
81 * * Second purpose of TIME-WAIT is catching old duplicate segments.
82 * Well, certainly it is pure paranoia, but if we load TIME-WAIT
83 * with this semantics, we MUST NOT kill TIME-WAIT state with RSTs.
84 * * If we invented some more clever way to catch duplicates
85 * (f.e. based on PAWS), we could truncate TIME-WAIT to several RTOs.
86 *
87 * The algorithm below is based on FORMAL INTERPRETATION of RFCs.
88 * When you compare it to RFCs, please, read section SEGMENT ARRIVES
89 * from the very beginning.
90 *
91 * NOTE. With recycling (and later with fin-wait-2) TW bucket
92 * is _not_ stateless. It means, that strictly speaking we must
93 * spinlock it. I do not want! Well, probability of misbehaviour
94 * is ridiculously low and, seems, we could use some mb() tricks
95 * to avoid misread sequence numbers, states etc. --ANK
96 */
97enum tcp_tw_status
8feaf0c0
ACM
98tcp_timewait_state_process(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct sk_buff *skb,
99 const struct tcphdr *th)
1da177e4 100{
8feaf0c0 101 struct tcp_timewait_sock *tcptw = tcp_twsk((struct sock *)tw);
1da177e4
LT
102 struct tcp_options_received tmp_opt;
103 int paws_reject = 0;
104
105 tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
8feaf0c0 106 if (th->doff > (sizeof(*th) >> 2) && tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp) {
1da177e4
LT
107 tcp_parse_options(skb, &tmp_opt, 0);
108
109 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
8feaf0c0
ACM
110 tmp_opt.ts_recent = tcptw->tw_ts_recent;
111 tmp_opt.ts_recent_stamp = tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp;
1da177e4
LT
112 paws_reject = tcp_paws_check(&tmp_opt, th->rst);
113 }
114 }
115
116 if (tw->tw_substate == TCP_FIN_WAIT2) {
117 /* Just repeat all the checks of tcp_rcv_state_process() */
118
119 /* Out of window, send ACK */
120 if (paws_reject ||
121 !tcp_in_window(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq,
8feaf0c0
ACM
122 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt,
123 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt + tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd))
1da177e4
LT
124 return TCP_TW_ACK;
125
126 if (th->rst)
127 goto kill;
128
8feaf0c0 129 if (th->syn && !before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt))
1da177e4
LT
130 goto kill_with_rst;
131
132 /* Dup ACK? */
8feaf0c0 133 if (!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt) ||
1da177e4 134 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq) {
8feaf0c0 135 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
136 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
137 }
138
139 /* New data or FIN. If new data arrive after half-duplex close,
140 * reset.
141 */
142 if (!th->fin ||
8feaf0c0 143 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq != tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt + 1) {
1da177e4 144kill_with_rst:
295ff7ed 145 inet_twsk_deschedule(tw, &tcp_death_row);
8feaf0c0 146 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
147 return TCP_TW_RST;
148 }
149
150 /* FIN arrived, enter true time-wait state. */
8feaf0c0
ACM
151 tw->tw_substate = TCP_TIME_WAIT;
152 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
1da177e4 153 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
8feaf0c0
ACM
154 tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec;
155 tcptw->tw_ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
1da177e4
LT
156 }
157
158 /* I am shamed, but failed to make it more elegant.
159 * Yes, it is direct reference to IP, which is impossible
160 * to generalize to IPv6. Taking into account that IPv6
caa20d9a 161 * do not understand recycling in any case, it not
1da177e4
LT
162 * a big problem in practice. --ANK */
163 if (tw->tw_family == AF_INET &&
295ff7ed 164 tcp_death_row.sysctl_tw_recycle && tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp &&
1da177e4 165 tcp_v4_tw_remember_stamp(tw))
696ab2d3
ACM
166 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, tw->tw_timeout,
167 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
1da177e4 168 else
696ab2d3
ACM
169 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN,
170 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
1da177e4
LT
171 return TCP_TW_ACK;
172 }
173
174 /*
175 * Now real TIME-WAIT state.
176 *
177 * RFC 1122:
178 * "When a connection is [...] on TIME-WAIT state [...]
179 * [a TCP] MAY accept a new SYN from the remote TCP to
180 * reopen the connection directly, if it:
181 *
182 * (1) assigns its initial sequence number for the new
183 * connection to be larger than the largest sequence
184 * number it used on the previous connection incarnation,
185 * and
186 *
187 * (2) returns to TIME-WAIT state if the SYN turns out
188 * to be an old duplicate".
189 */
190
191 if (!paws_reject &&
8feaf0c0 192 (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt &&
1da177e4
LT
193 (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq || th->rst))) {
194 /* In window segment, it may be only reset or bare ack. */
195
196 if (th->rst) {
caa20d9a 197 /* This is TIME_WAIT assassination, in two flavors.
1da177e4
LT
198 * Oh well... nobody has a sufficient solution to this
199 * protocol bug yet.
200 */
201 if (sysctl_tcp_rfc1337 == 0) {
202kill:
295ff7ed 203 inet_twsk_deschedule(tw, &tcp_death_row);
8feaf0c0 204 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
205 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
206 }
207 }
696ab2d3
ACM
208 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN,
209 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
1da177e4
LT
210
211 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
8feaf0c0
ACM
212 tcptw->tw_ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
213 tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec;
1da177e4
LT
214 }
215
8feaf0c0 216 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
217 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
218 }
219
220 /* Out of window segment.
221
222 All the segments are ACKed immediately.
223
224 The only exception is new SYN. We accept it, if it is
225 not old duplicate and we are not in danger to be killed
226 by delayed old duplicates. RFC check is that it has
227 newer sequence number works at rates <40Mbit/sec.
228 However, if paws works, it is reliable AND even more,
229 we even may relax silly seq space cutoff.
230
231 RED-PEN: we violate main RFC requirement, if this SYN will appear
232 old duplicate (i.e. we receive RST in reply to SYN-ACK),
233 we must return socket to time-wait state. It is not good,
234 but not fatal yet.
235 */
236
237 if (th->syn && !th->rst && !th->ack && !paws_reject &&
8feaf0c0
ACM
238 (after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt) ||
239 (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp &&
240 (s32)(tcptw->tw_ts_recent - tmp_opt.rcv_tsval) < 0))) {
241 u32 isn = tcptw->tw_snd_nxt + 65535 + 2;
1da177e4
LT
242 if (isn == 0)
243 isn++;
244 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when = isn;
245 return TCP_TW_SYN;
246 }
247
248 if (paws_reject)
249 NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_PAWSESTABREJECTED);
250
251 if(!th->rst) {
252 /* In this case we must reset the TIMEWAIT timer.
253 *
254 * If it is ACKless SYN it may be both old duplicate
255 * and new good SYN with random sequence number <rcv_nxt.
256 * Do not reschedule in the last case.
257 */
258 if (paws_reject || th->ack)
696ab2d3
ACM
259 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN,
260 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
1da177e4
LT
261
262 /* Send ACK. Note, we do not put the bucket,
263 * it will be released by caller.
264 */
265 return TCP_TW_ACK;
266 }
8feaf0c0 267 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
268 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
269}
270
1da177e4
LT
271/*
272 * Move a socket to time-wait or dead fin-wait-2 state.
273 */
274void tcp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo)
275{
8feaf0c0
ACM
276 struct inet_timewait_sock *tw = NULL;
277 const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
1da177e4
LT
278 int recycle_ok = 0;
279
295ff7ed 280 if (tcp_death_row.sysctl_tw_recycle && tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp)
1da177e4
LT
281 recycle_ok = tp->af_specific->remember_stamp(sk);
282
295ff7ed 283 if (tcp_death_row.tw_count < tcp_death_row.sysctl_max_tw_buckets)
c676270b 284 tw = inet_twsk_alloc(sk, state);
1da177e4 285
8feaf0c0
ACM
286 if (tw != NULL) {
287 struct tcp_timewait_sock *tcptw = tcp_twsk((struct sock *)tw);
463c84b9
ACM
288 const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
289 const int rto = (icsk->icsk_rto << 2) - (icsk->icsk_rto >> 1);
8feaf0c0 290
1da177e4 291 tw->tw_rcv_wscale = tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale;
8feaf0c0
ACM
292 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt = tp->rcv_nxt;
293 tcptw->tw_snd_nxt = tp->snd_nxt;
294 tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd = tcp_receive_window(tp);
295 tcptw->tw_ts_recent = tp->rx_opt.ts_recent;
296 tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp = tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp;
1da177e4
LT
297
298#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
299 if (tw->tw_family == PF_INET6) {
300 struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
8feaf0c0 301 struct tcp6_timewait_sock *tcp6tw = tcp6_twsk((struct sock *)tw);
1da177e4 302
8feaf0c0
ACM
303 ipv6_addr_copy(&tcp6tw->tw_v6_daddr, &np->daddr);
304 ipv6_addr_copy(&tcp6tw->tw_v6_rcv_saddr, &np->rcv_saddr);
305 tw->tw_ipv6only = np->ipv6only;
c676270b 306 }
1da177e4
LT
307#endif
308 /* Linkage updates. */
e48c414e 309 __inet_twsk_hashdance(tw, sk, &tcp_hashinfo);
1da177e4
LT
310
311 /* Get the TIME_WAIT timeout firing. */
312 if (timeo < rto)
313 timeo = rto;
314
315 if (recycle_ok) {
316 tw->tw_timeout = rto;
317 } else {
318 tw->tw_timeout = TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
319 if (state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
320 timeo = TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
321 }
322
696ab2d3
ACM
323 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, timeo,
324 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
8feaf0c0 325 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
326 } else {
327 /* Sorry, if we're out of memory, just CLOSE this
328 * socket up. We've got bigger problems than
329 * non-graceful socket closings.
330 */
331 if (net_ratelimit())
332 printk(KERN_INFO "TCP: time wait bucket table overflow\n");
333 }
334
335 tcp_update_metrics(sk);
336 tcp_done(sk);
337}
338
1da177e4
LT
339/* This is not only more efficient than what we used to do, it eliminates
340 * a lot of code duplication between IPv4/IPv6 SYN recv processing. -DaveM
341 *
342 * Actually, we could lots of memory writes here. tp of listening
343 * socket contains all necessary default parameters.
344 */
60236fdd 345struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, struct sk_buff *skb)
1da177e4 346{
9f1d2604 347 struct sock *newsk = inet_csk_clone(sk, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
1da177e4 348
87d11ceb 349 if (newsk != NULL) {
9f1d2604 350 const struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
2e6599cb 351 struct tcp_request_sock *treq = tcp_rsk(req);
9f1d2604 352 struct inet_connection_sock *newicsk = inet_csk(sk);
1da177e4 353 struct tcp_sock *newtp;
1da177e4 354
1da177e4
LT
355 /* Now setup tcp_sock */
356 newtp = tcp_sk(newsk);
357 newtp->pred_flags = 0;
2e6599cb 358 newtp->rcv_nxt = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
87d11ceb 359 newtp->snd_nxt = newtp->snd_una = newtp->snd_sml = treq->snt_isn + 1;
1da177e4
LT
360
361 tcp_prequeue_init(newtp);
362
2e6599cb 363 tcp_init_wl(newtp, treq->snt_isn, treq->rcv_isn);
1da177e4 364
1da177e4
LT
365 newtp->srtt = 0;
366 newtp->mdev = TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT;
463c84b9 367 newicsk->icsk_rto = TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT;
1da177e4
LT
368
369 newtp->packets_out = 0;
370 newtp->left_out = 0;
371 newtp->retrans_out = 0;
372 newtp->sacked_out = 0;
373 newtp->fackets_out = 0;
374 newtp->snd_ssthresh = 0x7fffffff;
375
376 /* So many TCP implementations out there (incorrectly) count the
377 * initial SYN frame in their delayed-ACK and congestion control
378 * algorithms that we must have the following bandaid to talk
379 * efficiently to them. -DaveM
380 */
381 newtp->snd_cwnd = 2;
382 newtp->snd_cwnd_cnt = 0;
9772efb9 383 newtp->bytes_acked = 0;
1da177e4
LT
384
385 newtp->frto_counter = 0;
386 newtp->frto_highmark = 0;
387
7957aed7 388 newicsk->icsk_ca_ops = &tcp_init_congestion_ops;
317a76f9 389
6687e988 390 tcp_set_ca_state(newsk, TCP_CA_Open);
1da177e4
LT
391 tcp_init_xmit_timers(newsk);
392 skb_queue_head_init(&newtp->out_of_order_queue);
2e6599cb
ACM
393 newtp->rcv_wup = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
394 newtp->write_seq = treq->snt_isn + 1;
1da177e4 395 newtp->pushed_seq = newtp->write_seq;
2e6599cb 396 newtp->copied_seq = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
1da177e4
LT
397
398 newtp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
399
400 newtp->rx_opt.dsack = 0;
401 newtp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = 0;
402
1da177e4
LT
403 newtp->rx_opt.num_sacks = 0;
404 newtp->urg_data = 0;
1da177e4 405
1da177e4 406 if (sock_flag(newsk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN))
463c84b9
ACM
407 inet_csk_reset_keepalive_timer(newsk,
408 keepalive_time_when(newtp));
1da177e4 409
2e6599cb
ACM
410 newtp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok = ireq->tstamp_ok;
411 if((newtp->rx_opt.sack_ok = ireq->sack_ok) != 0) {
1da177e4
LT
412 if (sysctl_tcp_fack)
413 newtp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= 2;
414 }
415 newtp->window_clamp = req->window_clamp;
416 newtp->rcv_ssthresh = req->rcv_wnd;
417 newtp->rcv_wnd = req->rcv_wnd;
2e6599cb 418 newtp->rx_opt.wscale_ok = ireq->wscale_ok;
1da177e4 419 if (newtp->rx_opt.wscale_ok) {
2e6599cb
ACM
420 newtp->rx_opt.snd_wscale = ireq->snd_wscale;
421 newtp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale = ireq->rcv_wscale;
1da177e4
LT
422 } else {
423 newtp->rx_opt.snd_wscale = newtp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale = 0;
424 newtp->window_clamp = min(newtp->window_clamp, 65535U);
425 }
426 newtp->snd_wnd = ntohs(skb->h.th->window) << newtp->rx_opt.snd_wscale;
427 newtp->max_window = newtp->snd_wnd;
428
429 if (newtp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok) {
430 newtp->rx_opt.ts_recent = req->ts_recent;
431 newtp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec;
432 newtp->tcp_header_len = sizeof(struct tcphdr) + TCPOLEN_TSTAMP_ALIGNED;
433 } else {
434 newtp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = 0;
435 newtp->tcp_header_len = sizeof(struct tcphdr);
436 }
437 if (skb->len >= TCP_MIN_RCVMSS+newtp->tcp_header_len)
463c84b9 438 newicsk->icsk_ack.last_seg_size = skb->len - newtp->tcp_header_len;
1da177e4
LT
439 newtp->rx_opt.mss_clamp = req->mss;
440 TCP_ECN_openreq_child(newtp, req);
441 if (newtp->ecn_flags&TCP_ECN_OK)
442 sock_set_flag(newsk, SOCK_NO_LARGESEND);
443
1da177e4
LT
444 TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_PASSIVEOPENS);
445 }
446 return newsk;
447}
448
449/*
450 * Process an incoming packet for SYN_RECV sockets represented
60236fdd 451 * as a request_sock.
1da177e4
LT
452 */
453
454struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb,
60236fdd
ACM
455 struct request_sock *req,
456 struct request_sock **prev)
1da177e4
LT
457{
458 struct tcphdr *th = skb->h.th;
459 struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
460 u32 flg = tcp_flag_word(th) & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN|TCP_FLAG_ACK);
461 int paws_reject = 0;
462 struct tcp_options_received tmp_opt;
463 struct sock *child;
464
465 tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
466 if (th->doff > (sizeof(struct tcphdr)>>2)) {
467 tcp_parse_options(skb, &tmp_opt, 0);
468
469 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
470 tmp_opt.ts_recent = req->ts_recent;
471 /* We do not store true stamp, but it is not required,
472 * it can be estimated (approximately)
473 * from another data.
474 */
475 tmp_opt.ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec - ((TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT/HZ)<<req->retrans);
476 paws_reject = tcp_paws_check(&tmp_opt, th->rst);
477 }
478 }
479
480 /* Check for pure retransmitted SYN. */
2e6599cb 481 if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn &&
1da177e4
LT
482 flg == TCP_FLAG_SYN &&
483 !paws_reject) {
484 /*
485 * RFC793 draws (Incorrectly! It was fixed in RFC1122)
486 * this case on figure 6 and figure 8, but formal
487 * protocol description says NOTHING.
488 * To be more exact, it says that we should send ACK,
489 * because this segment (at least, if it has no data)
490 * is out of window.
491 *
492 * CONCLUSION: RFC793 (even with RFC1122) DOES NOT
493 * describe SYN-RECV state. All the description
494 * is wrong, we cannot believe to it and should
495 * rely only on common sense and implementation
496 * experience.
497 *
498 * Enforce "SYN-ACK" according to figure 8, figure 6
499 * of RFC793, fixed by RFC1122.
500 */
60236fdd 501 req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(sk, req, NULL);
1da177e4
LT
502 return NULL;
503 }
504
505 /* Further reproduces section "SEGMENT ARRIVES"
506 for state SYN-RECEIVED of RFC793.
507 It is broken, however, it does not work only
508 when SYNs are crossed.
509
510 You would think that SYN crossing is impossible here, since
511 we should have a SYN_SENT socket (from connect()) on our end,
512 but this is not true if the crossed SYNs were sent to both
513 ends by a malicious third party. We must defend against this,
514 and to do that we first verify the ACK (as per RFC793, page
515 36) and reset if it is invalid. Is this a true full defense?
516 To convince ourselves, let us consider a way in which the ACK
517 test can still pass in this 'malicious crossed SYNs' case.
518 Malicious sender sends identical SYNs (and thus identical sequence
519 numbers) to both A and B:
520
521 A: gets SYN, seq=7
522 B: gets SYN, seq=7
523
524 By our good fortune, both A and B select the same initial
525 send sequence number of seven :-)
526
527 A: sends SYN|ACK, seq=7, ack_seq=8
528 B: sends SYN|ACK, seq=7, ack_seq=8
529
530 So we are now A eating this SYN|ACK, ACK test passes. So
531 does sequence test, SYN is truncated, and thus we consider
532 it a bare ACK.
533
295f7324
ACM
534 If icsk->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept, we silently drop this
535 bare ACK. Otherwise, we create an established connection. Both
536 ends (listening sockets) accept the new incoming connection and try
537 to talk to each other. 8-)
1da177e4
LT
538
539 Note: This case is both harmless, and rare. Possibility is about the
540 same as us discovering intelligent life on another plant tomorrow.
541
542 But generally, we should (RFC lies!) to accept ACK
543 from SYNACK both here and in tcp_rcv_state_process().
544 tcp_rcv_state_process() does not, hence, we do not too.
545
546 Note that the case is absolutely generic:
547 we cannot optimize anything here without
548 violating protocol. All the checks must be made
549 before attempt to create socket.
550 */
551
552 /* RFC793 page 36: "If the connection is in any non-synchronized state ...
553 * and the incoming segment acknowledges something not yet
caa20d9a 554 * sent (the segment carries an unacceptable ACK) ...
1da177e4
LT
555 * a reset is sent."
556 *
557 * Invalid ACK: reset will be sent by listening socket
558 */
559 if ((flg & TCP_FLAG_ACK) &&
2e6599cb 560 (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq != tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn + 1))
1da177e4
LT
561 return sk;
562
563 /* Also, it would be not so bad idea to check rcv_tsecr, which
564 * is essentially ACK extension and too early or too late values
565 * should cause reset in unsynchronized states.
566 */
567
568 /* RFC793: "first check sequence number". */
569
570 if (paws_reject || !tcp_in_window(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq,
2e6599cb 571 tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1, tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1 + req->rcv_wnd)) {
1da177e4
LT
572 /* Out of window: send ACK and drop. */
573 if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_RST))
60236fdd 574 req->rsk_ops->send_ack(skb, req);
1da177e4
LT
575 if (paws_reject)
576 NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_PAWSESTABREJECTED);
577 return NULL;
578 }
579
580 /* In sequence, PAWS is OK. */
581
2e6599cb 582 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp && !after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1))
1da177e4
LT
583 req->ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
584
2e6599cb 585 if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn) {
1da177e4 586 /* Truncate SYN, it is out of window starting
2e6599cb 587 at tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1. */
1da177e4
LT
588 flg &= ~TCP_FLAG_SYN;
589 }
590
591 /* RFC793: "second check the RST bit" and
592 * "fourth, check the SYN bit"
593 */
594 if (flg & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN))
595 goto embryonic_reset;
596
597 /* ACK sequence verified above, just make sure ACK is
598 * set. If ACK not set, just silently drop the packet.
599 */
600 if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_ACK))
601 return NULL;
602
603 /* If TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is set, drop bare ACK. */
295f7324
ACM
604 if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept &&
605 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1) {
2e6599cb 606 inet_rsk(req)->acked = 1;
1da177e4
LT
607 return NULL;
608 }
609
610 /* OK, ACK is valid, create big socket and
611 * feed this segment to it. It will repeat all
612 * the tests. THIS SEGMENT MUST MOVE SOCKET TO
613 * ESTABLISHED STATE. If it will be dropped after
614 * socket is created, wait for troubles.
615 */
616 child = tp->af_specific->syn_recv_sock(sk, skb, req, NULL);
617 if (child == NULL)
618 goto listen_overflow;
619
463c84b9
ACM
620 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_unlink(sk, req, prev);
621 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_removed(sk, req);
1da177e4 622
463c84b9 623 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add(sk, req, child);
1da177e4
LT
624 return child;
625
626 listen_overflow:
627 if (!sysctl_tcp_abort_on_overflow) {
2e6599cb 628 inet_rsk(req)->acked = 1;
1da177e4
LT
629 return NULL;
630 }
631
632 embryonic_reset:
633 NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_EMBRYONICRSTS);
634 if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_RST))
60236fdd 635 req->rsk_ops->send_reset(skb);
1da177e4 636
463c84b9 637 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(sk, req, prev);
1da177e4
LT
638 return NULL;
639}
640
641/*
642 * Queue segment on the new socket if the new socket is active,
643 * otherwise we just shortcircuit this and continue with
644 * the new socket.
645 */
646
647int tcp_child_process(struct sock *parent, struct sock *child,
648 struct sk_buff *skb)
649{
650 int ret = 0;
651 int state = child->sk_state;
652
653 if (!sock_owned_by_user(child)) {
654 ret = tcp_rcv_state_process(child, skb, skb->h.th, skb->len);
655
656 /* Wakeup parent, send SIGIO */
657 if (state == TCP_SYN_RECV && child->sk_state != state)
658 parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);
659 } else {
660 /* Alas, it is possible again, because we do lookup
661 * in main socket hash table and lock on listening
662 * socket does not protect us more.
663 */
664 sk_add_backlog(child, skb);
665 }
666
667 bh_unlock_sock(child);
668 sock_put(child);
669 return ret;
670}
671
672EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_check_req);
673EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_child_process);
674EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_create_openreq_child);
675EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_timewait_state_process);